CRITICAL PATCH ALERT: Stop the GitLab ‘Crash-and-Steal’ Vulnerabilities—Your 48-Hour Remediation Plan

By CyberDudeBivash • September 27, 2025 • DevSecOps Security Directive

This is an urgent security directive for all administrators of self-hosted GitLab instances. A set of critical vulnerabilities are being actively exploited in the wild, allowing unauthenticated attackers to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) through a chained “Crash-and-Steal” attack. The exploit chain, involving CVE-2025-30150 and CVE-2025-30151, can lead to the complete compromise of your GitLab instance, theft of source code, exfiltration of production secrets, and a devastating software supply chain attack. GitLab has released an emergency security patch that must be applied immediately. This is not a routine update. This is your tactical, 48-hour playbook to patch, hunt for compromise, and harden your defenses against this critical threat.

Disclosure: This is a technical security directive for DevOps, DevSecOps, and IT professionals. It contains affiliate links to best-in-class solutions for securing the software development lifecycle. Your support helps fund our independent research.

DevSecOps Incident Response Toolkit

Essential tools for patching, hunting, and hardening your CI/CD environment.

Identity Security (YubiKeys via AliExpress): The ultimate hardening step. Protect all your GitLab admin and developer accounts with phishing-resistant MFA.
Host Security (Kaspersky EDR): Gain visibility into the underlying server. Detect post-exploitation activity if an attacker breaks out of the GitLab application and lands on the host OS.
Team Skills & Training (Edureka): Your team’s ability to respond to a crisis is your best asset. Invest in certified training on DevSecOps, GitLab security, and incident response.
Secure Infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud): Host your GitLab instance in a secure, segmented cloud environment with a robust WAF to provide a critical first layer of defense.

48-Hour Remediation Plan: Table of Contents

Chapter 1: The Threat – Dissecting the ‘Crash-and-Steal’ Vulnerabilities

This is not a single vulnerability, but a chained exploit that combines two distinct flaws to achieve a full system compromise. The attack is elegant in its destructive efficiency.

Affected Self-Hosted Versions:

16.8.0 to 17.3.4
17.4.0 to 17.4.2
17.5.0

Note: GitLab.com (SaaS) is already patched by GitLab’s security team. This advisory applies to self-hosted instances only.

CVE-2025-30150 (The “Crash”): Unauthenticated Denial of Service

CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
Description: A flaw exists in the CI/CD runner registration endpoint of the GitLab web interface. An unauthenticated attacker can send a series of specially crafted, malformed HTTP requests to this endpoint. These requests cause the GitLab application to enter an infinite loop while trying to process the request, leading to 100% CPU and memory consumption. Within seconds, the entire GitLab instance becomes unresponsive and crashes.

CVE-2025-30151 (The “Steal”): Authentication Bypass leading to RCE

CVSS Score: 9.9 (Critical)

The “Crash-and-Steal” Kill Chain

The attacker identifies a vulnerable, publicly-accessible GitLab instance.
They launch the **”Crash”** attack (CVE-2025-30150), repeatedly hitting the runner endpoint to trigger a DoS and force the service to restart.
While monitoring the server’s status, they launch the **”Steal”** attack (CVE-2025-30151) in a tight loop, aiming to hit the privileged API endpoint during the brief reboot window where authentication is flawed.
Once successful, they gain RCE. From here, they can steal source code, exfiltrate CI/CD variables (which often contain production keys for AWS, GCP, etc.), and inject malicious code into your repositories—launching a devastating software supply chain attack.

Chapter 2: Your 48-Hour Emergency Remediation Plan

This is a time-boxed, tactical plan. Assemble your team (DevOps, Security, and IT) and begin immediately.

Phase 1 (Hours 0-2): Triage & Plan

The Goal: To assess the situation and create a clear plan of action.

Activate Incident Response Team: Formally declare an incident. This is not a routine patch. Designate an incident commander.
Verify Vulnerability: Confirm the exact version of your self-hosted GitLab instance by logging in as an admin and checking the Admin Area dashboard. Compare it against the list of affected versions.
Assess Exposure: Is your GitLab instance’s web UI accessible from the public internet? If so, you are at maximum risk.
Schedule Emergency Maintenance: This patch will require a service restart. Immediately schedule an emergency maintenance window.
Communicate with Stakeholders: Notify all development team leads that an emergency patch is required and that the system will be unavailable during the maintenance window. Early communication is key to minimizing disruption.

Phase 2 (Hours 2-8): Backup, Patch, Verify

The Goal: To apply the security patch safely and correctly.

TAKE A FULL BACKUP: Before you do anything else, take a complete, verified backup of your GitLab instance. Use the built-in Rake task to do this. This is your safety net.sudo gitlab-backup create
Apply the Security Patch: Follow the official GitLab update instructions for your specific installation type (Omnibus, Docker, etc.). Upgrade to the nearest patched version (e.g., if you are on 17.5.0, upgrade to 17.5.1). Do not skip major versions.
Verify the Upgrade: After the update is complete and the services have restarted, run the built-in self-check tools to ensure the instance is healthy.sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:check
Communicate Completion: Notify all stakeholders that the maintenance is complete and the system is back online.

Phase 3 (Hours 8-24): Hunt for Compromise

The Goal: To determine if you were compromised *before* you applied the patch.

You must now analyze your logs for the period leading up to your patch. Focus on these key files located in `/var/log/gitlab/` on a standard Omnibus installation.

Check NGINX Logs for the “Crash”: Look for a high volume of requests from a single IP address to the CI/CD runner registration path, often resulting in 500-level errors.# File: /var/log/gitlab/nginx/gitlab_access.log # Look for a flood of requests like this: 123.123.123.123 - - [27/Sep/2025:11:05:21 +0530] "POST /api/v4/runners HTTP/1.1" 500 ...
Check Rails Logs for the “Steal”: Correlate the time of the crash with any unusual activity in the Rails logs.# File: /var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/production_json.log # Look for API calls from the same suspicious IP immediately after a service restart. # Look for successful requests to sensitive endpoints that are missing a user_id or have a null value.
Audit for Malicious Activity:
- **Check the Audit Log:** In the GitLab UI, go to Admin -> Monitoring -> Audit Events. Look for any suspicious events: new user creations, users being promoted to admin, new projects created, or new CI/CD runners registered from unexpected IPs.
- **Check for New Runners:** Look for any new runners in your Admin -> CI/CD -> Runners section that you do not recognize.
- **Check for Modified Projects:** Look for any suspicious code commits, or changes to project CI/CD variables that occurred during the at-risk period.

Phase 4 (Hours 24-48): Harden & Review

The Goal: To implement immediate hardening measures and learn from the incident.

Implement Hardening Controls: Review the strategic hardening measures in the next chapter and implement at least two high-impact changes (e.g., restricting access to the web UI by IP, enforcing MFA for all admins).
Conduct a Blameless Post-Mortem: Assemble the team. What went well in our response? What went poorly? Was our patching process too slow? Was our logging sufficient to find the IoCs? Use this crisis to improve your process for the next one.

Chapter 3: Strategic Hardening for Your GitLab Environment

Patching is reactive. A secure DevOps environment is proactive. Use this incident as the catalyst to implement these essential hardening measures.

Reduce Your Attack Surface: This is the most important control. If your GitLab instance is only used by internal employees, **do not expose it to the public internet.** Place it on a private network and require users to connect via a secure VPN or a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution. If you must expose it, restrict access to known trusted IP ranges using the built-in IP allowlisting features or a WAF.
Enforce Universal, Phishing-Resistant MFA: Every single user, without exception, should have Multi-Factor Authentication enabled. For your administrators and developers, you must go a step further and mandate the use of phishing-resistant hardware tokens like YubiKeys. A stolen password should never be enough to compromise your source code.
Secure Your CI/CD Runners: Treat your runners as highly sensitive, ephemeral assets.
- Run jobs in containers (Docker, Kubernetes) to ensure a clean environment for every build.
- Apply the principle of least privilege. A runner for a simple web app should not have access to production database credentials.
- Use strict network egress filtering to control where your runners can send traffic. A runner should never be able to connect to an arbitrary IP on the internet.
Externalize Your Secrets Management: While GitLab’s CI/CD variables are convenient, for your most sensitive production secrets, use a dedicated secrets vault like HashiCorp Vault. This adds another layer of authentication and auditing around your crown jewels.
Upskill Your Team in DevSecOps: A secure platform requires a skilled team. Invest in continuous education for your developers and DevOps engineers on the principles of secure coding and CI/CD security. A structured curriculum from a provider like Edureka is a critical investment in your supply chain security.

Chapter 4: Extended FAQ for DevOps and Security Engineers

Q: We use the GitLab.com cloud (SaaS) version. Are we affected?
A: No. This advisory is for self-hosted GitLab CE and EE instances only. The GitLab.com infrastructure is managed and patched by GitLab’s internal security and SRE teams. They have already applied the necessary fixes to their environment.

Q: We are several major versions behind the latest release. How should we patch?
A: You must follow GitLab’s official upgrade path documentation. You cannot jump directly from a very old version to the latest one. You will need to perform a multi-step upgrade, moving between specific required versions. This will extend your maintenance window, which is why staying current on patches is so critical.

Q: Can a Web Application Firewall (WAF) have blocked this attack?
A: A properly configured WAF could have provided a crucial layer of defense. It could have been configured with rate-limiting rules to block the DoS flood (the “Crash”) from a single IP. It could also potentially have been configured with a virtual patch to block the specific malicious pattern used in the RCE (the “Steal”). This is a perfect example of why a WAF is a key part of a defense-in-depth strategy for any web-facing application.

Q: What are the signs of a compromised CI/CD runner?
A: Look for anomalous behavior on the runner itself. Is the runner process spawning unexpected shells (`bash`, `sh`)? Is it making network connections to destinations not related to your code repositories or package registries? Is it exhibiting unusually high CPU or network activity outside of a build job? You need EDR-like visibility (like that from Kaspersky) on your runner hosts to detect this.

Join the CyberDudeBivash ThreatWire Newsletter

Get urgent patch alerts, deep-dive reports on supply chain attacks, and DevSecOps best practices delivered to your inbox. Protect your code, protect your company. Subscribe to stay ahead. Subscribe on LinkedIn

Related Security Directives from CyberDudeBivash

#CyberDudeBivash #GitLab #DevSecOps #PatchAlert #CVE #IncidentResponse #ThreatHunting #RCE #CI/CD #SupplyChainSecurity

Cyberdudebivash