CODE RED • SOFTWARE SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACK

 175 Malicious npm Packages With 26,000 Downloads Attacking Technology, and Energy Companies Worldwide    

By CyberDudeBivash • October 11, 2025 • V7 “Goliath” Deep Dive

 cyberdudebivash.com |       cyberbivash.blogspot.com 

Share on XShare on LinkedIn

Disclosure: This is a threat intelligence briefing for security and development professionals. It contains affiliate links to relevant enterprise security solutions. Your support helps fund our independent research.

 Definitive Guide: Table of Contents 

1. Part 1: The Executive Briefing — The Crisis of the Open-Source Supply Chain
2. Part 2: Technical Deep Dive — A Masterclass on Dependency Confusion & Typosquatting
3. Part 3: The Defender’s Playbook — A Guide for Developers, DevOps, and CISOs
4. Part 4: The Strategic Takeaway — The Mandate for a Secure Software Factory

Part 1: The Executive Briefing — The Crisis of the Open-Source Supply Chain

This is a CODE RED alert for all organizations that use Node.js and the npm ecosystem. Security researchers have uncovered a massive, coordinated **software supply chain attack** involving at least **175 malicious packages** published to the public npm registry. These packages, downloaded over 26,000 times, were specifically designed to target developers and CI/CD systems within the technology and energy sectors, with the ultimate goal of stealing credentials and establishing a persistent backdoor.

For CISOs, this incident is a brutal confirmation of the systemic risk inherent in our modern, open-source-driven software development practices. The very speed and efficiency of our CI/CD pipelines have been turned against us, creating an automated distribution channel for malware. A compromised developer workstation or build server is a “keys to the kingdom” breach, and this campaign is a direct assault on that critical infrastructure.

---

Part 2: Technical Deep Dive — A Masterclass on Dependency Confusion & Typosquatting

The Kill Chain: From `npm install` to RCE

The attackers used a two-pronged approach to trick developers into installing their malware.

1. **Typosquatting:** They published packages with names that were common misspellings of popular, legitimate libraries (e.g., `cross-env-dev` instead of `cross-env`).
2. **Dependency Confusion:** This was the more sophisticated vector. The attackers performed OSINT to discover the names of *private, internal* packages used by their target companies. They then published malicious packages with these same names to the public npm registry. When a developer’s build tool runs `npm install`, if it is not configured correctly, it can get “confused” and download the public, malicious package instead of the private, legitimate one.
3. **The `postinstall` Script:** The malicious payload was executed via a `postinstall` script in the `package.json` file. This script automatically runs after the package is installed, downloading a second-stage infostealer or RAT from a remote server.

---

Part 3: The Defender’s Playbook — A Guide for Developers, DevOps, and CISOs

Defending against supply chain attacks requires a multi-layered, **DevSecOps** approach.

For Developers & DevOps Teams:

1. **USE A PRIVATE REGISTRY:** This is the #1 defense against dependency confusion. Host all of your internal packages on a private registry (like Verdaccio, JFrog Artifactory, or GitHub Packages) and configure your build tools to only look there for these packages.
2. **USE SCOPED PACKAGES:** Always use scopes for your internal packages (e.g., `@mycompany/internal-package`). It is impossible for an attacker to publish a package under your private scope to the public registry.
3. **SCRUTINIZE `package.json`:** Before running `npm install` on a new project, carefully review every dependency. Look for typos. Be wary of packages with few downloads or a recent publish date.
4. **USE `npm ci` IN YOUR PIPELINE:** For your production builds, always use `npm ci` instead of `npm install`. This command uses the `package-lock.json` file to perform a clean, deterministic install, which prevents an attacker from sneaking in a new malicious version of a dependency.

For CISOs and Security Teams:

• **The Mandate for an SBOM:** You must have a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). You cannot defend against a malicious library if you do not know you are using it.
• **Protect the Developer Endpoint:** Developer workstations are Tier-0 assets. They must be protected with a modern **EDR/XDR** platform that can detect the behavioral anomalies of a malicious `postinstall` script (e.g., the `node` process spawning a shell or making a suspicious network connection).

 Detect the Post-Exploitation Behavior: A modern **XDR platform** is essential. It can see that a legitimate build process is behaving maliciously and automatically terminate the attack chain, providing a critical safety net for your SDLC.  

---

Part 4: The Strategic Takeaway — The Mandate for a Secure Software Factory

For CISOs, this massive campaign is the final piece of evidence needed to justify a major investment in **DevSecOps** and supply chain security. The modern software factory is a complex, automated, and highly interconnected ecosystem. A single weak link in that chain—a developer’s typo, a misconfigured build agent—can lead to a full-scale compromise. The security of your software supply chain is now one of your most critical business risks.

Explore the CyberDudeBivash Ecosystem

Our Core Services:

• CISO Advisory & Strategic Consulting
• Penetration Testing & Red Teaming
• Digital Forensics & Incident Response (DFIR)
• Advanced Malware & Threat Analysis
• Supply Chain & DevSecOps Audits

Follow Our Main Blog for Daily Threat IntelVisit Our Official Site & Portfolio

About the Author

CyberDudeBivash is a cybersecurity strategist with 15+ years in DevSecOps, application security, and supply chain risk management, advising CISOs across APAC. [Last Updated: October 11, 2025]

  #CyberDudeBivash #NPM #SupplyChain #DevSecOps #CyberSecurity #InfoSec #ThreatIntel #CISO #AppSec