
Published by CyberDudeBivash • Date: Nov 1, 2025 (IST)
Your Third-Party Risk is Showing: CISO Briefing on the Airstalk Malware Supply Chain Attack
A newly-discovered malware family dubbed Airstalk (activity cluster CL‑STA‑1009) is being used in sophisticated supply chain attacks that exploit the VMware AirWatch / Workspace ONE UEM API to exfiltrate browser data, credentials and secrets — through third-party vendor environments or BPO partners. This CISO briefing explains what happened, why it matters for your third-party risk posture, and what you must do in the next 30-60-90 days.CyberDudeBivash Ecosystem:Apps & Services · CyberBivash (Threat Intel) · CryptoBivash · News Portal · Subscribe: ThreatWire
TL;DR — What Every CISO Must Know
- New malware family Airstalk: Targets Windows hosts via vendor/BPO supply-chain, abuses AirWatch UEM API for covert C2 and exfiltration of browser cookies, history and screenshots.
- Third-party/BPO risk spotlighted: The malware is designed to live in vendor or outsourcer environments, then pivot into client networks.
- CISO action agenda: Audit vendor MDM access, enforce strict API logging, hunt for C2 via MDM APIs, segment trust zones, and raise vendor risk KPIs.
Contents
- 1) What is Airstalk? Key Findings
- 2) Why It Matters to Your Organization
- 3) Third-Party Risk & BPO Exposure
- 4) Detection & Hunt Strategies (MDM, Endpoint, Network)
- 5) Mitigations: Vendor Controls, MDM API Hardening, Supply Chain Hygiene
- 6) CISO 30-60-90 Day Rollout Plan
- FAQ
- Sources
1) What is Airstalk? Key Findings
Research from Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 identifies a new Windows-based malware family named Airstalk, available in both PowerShell and .NET variants.
The attack uses the AirWatch / Workspace ONE UEM API — in particular endpoints such as /api/mdm/devices/ and /api/mam/blobs/uploadblob — to carry out covert C2 and file upload/exfiltration tasks.
Capabilities include: screenshot capture, browser cookie/history/bookmark theft, file enumeration, stealth persistence (especially in .NET variant).
Researchers assess with medium confidence that this is a supply-chain attack targeting business process outsourcing (BPO) or vendor environments — cluster named CL-STA-1009.
2) Why It Matters to Your Organization
- Vendor pivot risk: If a vendor’s managed devices are compromised (with UEM/API access), attackers can use those credentials or trusted devices to gain access to multiple downstream clients.
- Stealthy exfiltration: Use of legitimate MDM API traffic means traditional network sensors may miss the C2 and exfil flows. Storage of browser cookies/bookmarks = lateral access capability to user sessions.
- Regulatory &-compliance impact: If vendor devices store client PII or session tokens, breach of vendor ecosystem triggers your incident, not just theirs.
- Trust boundary erosion: Your supply chain becomes part of your exposure perimeter — you must treat vendor devices/management APIs as part of your risk domain.
3) Third-Party Risk & BPO Exposure
Airstalk’s design shows clear targeting of vendor/BPO models: researchers note “particularly disastrous for organisations that use BPO because stolen browser session cookies could allow access to a large number of their clients.”
Key risk vectors:
- Vendor devices enrolled in your UEM but out-of-scope for your direct controls (unless you mandate visibility).
- Vendor access to API endpoints for device management, update processes and telemetry ingestion — these can be turned into covert C2 channels.
- Shared credentials, weak API token segregation, insufficient monitoring of vendor-side devices and cloud services.
Therefore your third-party risk management must include: whether vendors have device fleets, whether those fleets have access to your tenancy, whether vendor credentials have wide lateral reach — this attack demands those questions be revisited now.
4) Detection & Hunt Strategies (MDM, Endpoint, Network)
MDM/API Layer
# Example SIEM query pseudocode:
let mgmtCalls = ApiLogs
| where ApiEndpoint in ("/api/mdm/devices","/api/mam/blobs/uploadblob")
| where ActorPrincipalType == "VendorServiceAccount"
| where callCount > 100 and DestinationCountry not in ("US","JP","UK")
| project TimeGenerated, Actor, Endpoint, ClientDeviceId
| order by TimeGenerated desc
Alert on unusual volume of device-attribute updates or blob uploads from vendor tokens/devices.
Endpoint / Host
# Suspicious process launch by vendor-trained MDM agent:
ProcessCreation
| where ParentImage contains "AirWatchAgent.exe" OR "WorkspaceONEAgent.exe"
| and NewProcessName in ("powershell.exe","cmd.exe","rundll32.exe")
| and CommandLine contains "-exec" or "-upload"
Hunt for suspicious child processes of MDM agents or unexpected outbound connections from vendor-devices.
Network / Egress
- Monitor traffic from vendor device subnets to unusual endpoints or C2 domains; focus on encrypted blob uploads via known MDM domains.
- Inspect for
/api/mam/blobs/uploadblobcalls that originate from unexpected IPs or exceed normal volume thresholds.
5) Mitigations: Vendor Controls, MDM API Hardening, Supply Chain Hygiene
- Vendor device inventory: Require all vendors/BPOs to disclose fleets enrolled in your UEM/MDM; map which devices and tokens have your access.
- Token & API management: Implement least-privilege vendor tokens; rotate regularly; apply conditional access (MFA, geolocation); restrict MDM API scope to only what’s needed.
- Network segmentation: Place vendor-managed devices and management consoles in a restricted zone; treat them as semi-untrusted; limit lateral access to your environment.
- API logging and anomaly detection: Enable full logging for UEM APIs; feed into SIEM/UEBA; baseline “normal” vendor device behaviour and alert on deviations.
- Third-party audits & attestation: Include vendor security in SLAs; require independent penetration tests, supply-chain assurance, and breach notification clause including your downstream impact.
- Containment plans: Pre-define vendor isolation processes; if a vendor device is compromised, you must have ability to block their API tokens, unenroll devices, revoke access quickly.
6) CISO 30-60-90 Day Rollout Plan
Day 0-30: Assess & Contain
- List all third-party vendors/BPOs with device fleets or UEM/MDM integration; categorize by risk and access level.
- Audit your UEM/MDM-API access logs for vendor-token usage in past 90 days; look for spike patterns or unusual device attribute writes.
- Apply immediate containment: enforce vendor token rotation, restrict blobs/uploads volumes and refactor vendor device network segmentation.
Day 31-60: Strengthen & Monitor
- Deploy the detection queries above (MDM/API, endpoint, network) and integrate into your SIEM/UEBA.
- Update your third-party risk program: require vendor fleets to report agent versions, token use, device enrolment metrics; include sandbox testing of vendor-device behaviour.
- Segment vendor device zones, apply tighter conditional access, limit lateral movement and enforce jump-host/zero-trust pattern for vendor admin access.
Day 61-90: Audit & Continuously Improve
- Run full tabletop / red-team scenario: “Vendor device compromised → your client session cookie stolen → access pivot to your network.” Validate your containment and incident response flow.
- Measure vendor-risk KPIs: % devices in vendor fleets compliant; number of vendor-token rotations; mean time to revoke vendor access when anomaly detected.
- Update contract templates to include mandatory breach simulation, device telemetry sharing, and third-party trust audits at least annually.
FAQ
Is this relevant only to vendors with device fleets?
No. Even vendors without fleets but with API integrations (UEM/MDM, update services, telemetry, logging agents) are part of your supply-chain risk. Attackers can exploit any indirect trust channel.
Should we block all vendor device enrolment?
Not necessarily. But you must treat vendor-devices as “semi-trusted” and apply zero-trust controls: minimal access, segmentation, logging, and rapid revocation mechanisms.
What’s the single most effective control right now?
Enforce least-privilege MDM/API tokens for vendors and apply tight network segmentation so vendor-managed devices cannot freely access client networks or cloud consoles.
Sources
- Unit 42: “Suspected Nation-State Threat Actor Uses New Airstalk Malware in a Supply Chain Attack” (Oct 29 2025)
- The Hacker News: “New Airstalk Malware in a Supply Chain Attack” (Oct 31 2025)
- CyberPress / GBHackers coverage of Airstalk and target analysis.
CyberDudeBivash — Services, Apps & Ecosystem
- Third-Party Risk & Supply-Chain Cyber Program Design (vendor device audit, API access review, token governance)
- Detection Engineering (MDM API anomaly detection, vendor-fleet telemetry, vendor device segmentation analytics)
- Incident Response (vendor-device compromise playbook, supply-chain breach scenario simulation, vendor token revocation plan)
Apps & Products · Consulting & Services · ThreatWire Newsletter · CyberBivash (Threat Intel) · News Portal · CryptoBivash
Edureka: Supply-chain & Third-Party Risk CoursesKaspersky: Endpoint/EDRAliExpress WWAlibaba WW
Ecosystem: cyberdudebivash.com | cyberbivash.blogspot.com | cryptobivash.code.blog | cyberdudebivash-news.blogspot.com | ThreatWire
Author: CyberDudeBivash • Powered by CyberDudeBivash • © 2025
#CyberDudeBivash #CyberBivash #Airstalk #SupplyChainAttack #ThirdPartyRisk #MDM #VendorSecurity #ThreatWire
Leave a comment