Enhancing Cybersecurity Incident Response with AI By CyberDudeBivash — Founder, CyberDudeBivash | Cybersecurity & AI

Executive summary

Incident Response (IR) is now a machine-speed problem. Attackers automate discovery, phishing, and lateral movement; defenders must automate detection, triage, containment, and learning. AI—done right—turns IR from a manual ticket factory into a closed-loop, learning system that gets faster and more precise after every incident.

---

1) Where AI Fits in the NIST IR Lifecycle

Framework baseline: NIST SP 800-61 (Preparation → Detection/Analysis → Containment/Eradication/Recovery → Post-Incident).
AI upgrades per phase:

1. Preparation
   • Attack-surface graphing (asset + identity + SaaS) using graph embeddings.
   • Synthetic incidents & purple-team simulations generated by LLMs to stress playbooks.
   • Policy QA: LLM checks playbooks against standards (NIST/ISO/PCI) and flags gaps.
2. Detection & Analysis
   • Unsupervised anomaly detection on logs/EDR/NetFlow.
   • LLMs for natural-language log triage (summarize 50k events to the 10 that matter).
   • Phishing verdicting with multi-modal models (headers + content + URL + attachments).
   • Root-cause hints: model suggests likely TTP chain (MITRE ATT&CK).
3. Containment
   • SOAR + agentic workflows choose the least-disruptive containment action based on business criticality (from CMDB/asset tags).
   • RL (reinforcement learning) policy improves isolation choices over time.
4. Eradication & Recovery
   • Playbook auto-generation of eradication steps (EDR actions, IR commands).
   • AI verifies success by re-running Indicators of Compromise (IOC) hunts and health checks.
5. Post-Incident
   • Auto-generated timeline & RCA (with evidence links).
   • Lessons learned → converted to new detections, playbooks, and guardrails; models retrain on the new case.

---

2) Reference Architecture (what to build)

Telemetry → Feature Store → Models → Guardrails → SOAR → Feedback

• Ingest: EDR, DNS, proxy, auth, SaaS (M365/AzureAD/Google Workspace), cloud control planes, email, DLP, EDR, network sensors.
• Lakehouse/Message bus: S3/GCS/ADLS + Kafka (or cloud pub/sub).
• Feature store: session entropy, rare service principal usage, parent/child process chains, geo/ASN mix, file reputation, UEBA signals.
• Models:
  • UEBA (unsupervised clustering) for identity abuse.
  • Sequence models for process trees.
  • URL/content classifiers for phishing.
  • LLM for NL triage and summarization.
• Guardrails: policy engine (OPA/Rego); egress allow-list for tools; human-in-the-loop thresholds.
• SOAR: executes actions (isolate host, block hash, revoke token, disable user, quarantine mail).
• ModelOps: model registry, A/B, drift monitors, red-team/jailbreak tests.

---

3) Three high-value AI use cases (with copy-paste)

A) Cloud account takeover (token theft)

Signals: impossible travel + new OAuth app consent + spike in Graph API reads.
KQL (Entra/Sentinel)

kustoCopyEditlet t1 = SigninLogs
| where ResultType == 0
| summarize makeset(LocationDetails.countryOrRegion) by UserPrincipalName, bin(TimeGenerated, 1h);
let t2 = AuditLogs
| where OperationName in ("Consent to application","Add app role assignment to service principal");
t1
| join kind=inner t2 on UserPrincipalName
| where datetime_diff("minute", t2.TimeGenerated, TimeGenerated) between (0 .. 60)

AI triage: LLM summarizes user context (MFA, device posture, roles), then proposes containment options ranked by blast radius.
SOAR action (pseudo):

yamlCopyEdit- if: risk > 0.8
  do:
    - revoke_refresh_tokens(user)
    - disable_user(user)
    - block_ip(source_ip)
    - create_ticket(priority="P1", tags=["OAuthConsent","AccountTakeover"])

B) Ransomware pre-encryption

Signals: vssadmin + mass file rename + SMB bursts + EDR canary trip.
Sigma (EDR)

yamlCopyEdittitle: VSS Deletion
logsource: windows
detection:
  selection:
    Image|endswith: '\vssadmin.exe'
    CommandLine|contains: ['delete shadows', 'resize shadowstorage']
condition: selection
level: high

AI: sequence model flags chain; LLM explains likely family and MITRE tactics; SOAR isolates endpoints, disables accounts, blocks C2 domains; EDR kills processes.

C) Phishing with malicious archives

Signals: MIME anomalies, archive writes outside extraction path, macro spawn.
Detections: watch for WinRAR/7z spawning wscript/powershell/cmd; AI URL model scores landing pages; LLM extracts business context (“CFO wire approval”).
Containment: auto-quarantine email, retrohunt mailbox, purge enterprise-wide, notify exposed users.

---

4) Building the AI Co-pilot for Analysts

Prompt templates (put in SOAR):

• “Summarize these logs into a 10-line incident synopsis with MITRE tactics, likely root cause, and top 5 next actions. Return JSON.”
• “Given this EDR process tree and VT scores, decide: isolate host Y/N with justification; list 3 evidence references.”
• “Convert this chat transcript & command history into a post-incident report with timeline and RCA bullets.”

Guardrails

• Immutable system prompts; no external browsing from the co-pilot account.
• Only read-only access to raw logs; write actions go through SOAR policies.
• Red-team LLM with jailbreak corpora; block “ignore previous instructions” patterns.

---

5) Metrics that matter (prove ROI)

• MTTD & MTTR (aim for 30–60% reduction in 90 days).
• Triage compression: events→cases (target 10:1).
• Containment time (median minutes to isolate/revoke).
• False positive/negative rate per model; analyst acceptance rate.
• Playbook automation coverage (% steps executed by SOAR).
• Model drift & re-training cadence.

---

6) Risks, failure modes, and how to mitigate

• Hallucinations / wrong advice → human-in-the-loop approvals; require evidence citations.
• Adversarial prompts / data poisoning → sanitize RAG sources; signatures on indexed content; DP-SGD for privacy.
• Over-automation outages → circuit-breakers (e.g., max isolates per hour), change-window awareness.
• Compliance & privacy → data minimization, PII masking, audit trails for every model decision.

---

7) 30-60-90 day rollout plan

Days 1–30: inventory telemetry; wire SOAR; deploy phishing classifier + LLM triage in “recommend-only” mode; add containment runbooks.
Days 31–60: expand to cloud account takeover & ransomware pre-encryption; enable two auto-containment actions with approvals.
Days 61–90: add attack-surface graph; nightly AI red-team; drift dashboards; promote trusted actions to full auto for low-risk assets.

---

8) Quick copy-paste library

Athena – suspicious process tree from web server

sqlCopyEditSELECT eventTime, user, parentProcess, process, cmdline
FROM edr_proc
WHERE parentProcess IN ('w3wp.exe','httpd','nginx','java')
  AND process IN ('powershell.exe','cmd.exe','bash')
  AND eventTime > now() - interval '1' day;

Sentinel – burst of mailbox purges after phish

kustoCopyEditOfficeActivity
| where Operation in ("HardDelete","SoftDelete")
| summarize count() by UserId, bin(TimeGenerated, 5m)
| where count_ > 50

SOAR – minimal host isolation (CrowdStrike/Defender)

yamlCopyEdit- isolate_endpoint: { host_id: "{{ host }}" }
- block_hash: { sha256: "{{ file_hash }}" }
- notify: { channel: "sec-incident", text: "Host {{host}} isolated for ransomware pre-encryption" }

---

Conclusion

AI isn’t a silver bullet, but it does turn incident response into a learning system: the more you defend, the better your models and playbooks get. Start with AI triage + SOAR containment on two use-cases, keep humans in the loop, and scale from there. The result: lower MTTR, fewer outages, and measurable risk reduction.Share